![]() If it was only one or two thing I understand but there are so many odd things for some reasonĪgain, the things you consider as "odd" are not necessarily even relevant. They could have died miles upstream from where the remains were found, or they could have died right there. There's no indication that they were even murdered, and we have no idea where they were after the final photo, or where they died. And when you are trying to get the data to match your theory it's all too easy to lean towards the conclusion you want.Įven the fact woman was murdered closeby to the place they were found looks odd. There are so many variables, and so little evidence, that it's impossible to make any conclusion that isn't wildly speculative. For example if they died together then Kris could have been closer to the water, or in more sunlight or the shade, or one of them could have gotten washed into the river before the other, or been under water, or on a different shore, etc. There are many possibilities for the state of the remains. That's fair enough, but it's not really conclusive in any way. Personally I would say Kris because the States of her remains.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |